Tuesday, July 24, 2007

Matheran


No words to describe now. My first visit to a hill station. Damn I wanna go mussoorie nw but the reason being very diff here

Chanakya- the society of people with high IQ

After twisters, plans are to evolve a new society. Society of people having only high IQ. Chanakya.. the community which differs from rest of world only on IQ basis. I don't know why I am doing this but lets meet a month after

Tuesday, June 26, 2007

My travel world66 profile

Your travel type: Travel Yup

The Travel Yup likes exotic and adventurous travel, but prefers big cities with fast paced life. He has a keen interest in other cultures and always brings home a few souvenirs.

Shopping in Bangkok, getting a tailor made suite in Kuala Lumpur, that's the kind of thing the Travel Yup is into. Even though he likes to get away, he prefers his travels to be comfortable.

top destinations:

Amsterdam
Beirut
Tahiti

stay away from:

Hampi
Darien Gap
Cairo
get your own travel profile

Wednesday, March 21, 2007

I seriously want to bunk one minor. But not getting guts to give re-exam alone :(

Thursday, March 15, 2007

k....



Mr. Hebrew: Sir Madam died today.

Mr. Ali: k



Mr. Tangent: Hey you got 1 mn lottery prize!! J

Mr. Android: k



Mrs. Phebe: haha

Mr. Whooishch: k




Mr. Mackey: M'kay, kids, you shouldn't do drugs, m'kay, drugs are bad.

Eric: k




Mr. Pimphoo: k

Commensuration issues? Well, “k” is the best word.

Okay is a term of approval or assent, often written as OK, O.K., ok, okay, okee, okie, or more informally as simply kay or k. Sometimes used with other words, as in "okey, dokey". When used to describe the quality of a thing, it denotes acceptability. However, its usage can also be strongly approving; as with most slang, its usage is determined by context. It could be one of the most widely used words on Earth, since it has spread from English to many other languages.”

For etymology please use wiki search on right. To stress, okay/k/okie etc., neither has got a brand name yet but I do believe they will work well. “Satisfaction” is what is depicted by this word. But okay doesn’t signify best of all. May be that’s the reason for it never getting a brand name. But anyway “okay” university will work very well. (People generally never want best education/ general people don’t want best education) Okay brand name for burgers will never work.

Mr. Waste: I am eating okay.
Mrs. Waste: So stupid of you “S Ol”.

How about Okay Business Solutions? Brand OBS like UBS. But believe me founder will be a crazy guy and I know the campaign will be done by

OBS Solutions

Why should we care?




This is really an open problem. Okay! Mint is a decent answer but again not satisfactory. (Please don’t think why I thought of it. It can give bad impression of me.)

k sometimes is also considered as irritating word for person showing no interest in the topic. Best cobbling tool in discussions, this word is best for dealing with irritating people. But the word sometimes gets very light for most people don’t understand/ pretend not to understand.

Sheriff: Hey you know what?

Linda: k

Sheriff: Yes I got that job.

Linda: k

Sheriff: hmm and you know that dog I had. Wow I can’t wait to tell

Linda: k

Sheriff: oh this dog is..

Linda: Ohh no! I had doctor’s appointment for my braces (now that was better)

Sheriff: M’kay

To end with, I am very sorry for you, if you read that whole. How waste is your time like mine.

Sunday, March 11, 2007

SW: reading this article can harm you


I would like you to please visit http://www.smokinlicious.com/ first. Good said 21st century people will never write relevant things and you would have better clicked an ad floating by some company named Google on right which could have earned me money (People usually don't like these ads. They say ads are most of the times not relevant. But I am big time google fan. Are you?). But leave, I am not here to make money but it just looks good to provide good related links to your reader. I would like to mention that I am an Indian and PM (PHEBE) says:

“Coz smoking is injurious to health, so as I wish 1 burning butt kills one day of ur life. Now calculations, 5 bucks= 1 day of ur life....so losing 1 day of ur life for just 5 makes u live a wealthy life-take the average dude. So ‘smoke coz smoking is injurious to health n cheap ...’"

Don’t worry for me I am not afraid of anybody. And I have to mention, I don’t want to but dark knight (he is same old friend) has his view too though I know it doesn’t matter what he say.

“always kills... be it passive or active... so lets smoke and kill others ... of course its better to die by killing a few than dying for a duck :P...so njoy and keep that smoke killing.”

But don’t consider his views though people say he is bit stud sort of person and inimitable too (L). Still doesn’t matter. People are “Induhviduals” sometimes.

Another says (but he is again hopeless, he is doing civil engineering)

“It helped me in increasing my water intake”

And about me, I want to just say that I am very much interested in working for any anti-smoking campaign company if given good money and preferably if it is in NY.

Smoking is cool, addictive and cigarette manufacturing is cheap. This forms the base of Tobacco Industry. A major part of investment for Tobacco Industry is for smoking campaign and promotion. Marlboro campaign is familiar and known. If you very much stand against the campaign “Making the Killing” will be inspiring. For the news:

The tobacco industry loses close to 5,000 customers every day in the US alone-- including 3,500 who manage to quit and about 1,200 who die. The most promising "replacement smokers" are young people: 90% of smokers begin before they're 21, and 60% before they're 14! To find their new customers, every day US tobacco companies spend $11 million to advertise and promote cigarettes -- more than the US Federal Office on Smoking and Health spends to prevent smoking in an entire year -Infact report.

Smoking is dangerous, bad and silent killer. So why not to ban it completely. This is what the campaign always fights for. Catching people, finding new market for them, educating people about after effects and conducting new researches is the campaign. Smoking promotion was a real big campaign and big names handled it very strategically and they have succeeded. Though every single individual knows how badly smoking can affect him but still it has found a good market. I don’t want to discuss that because all are familiar with Marlboro man etc. . So if you are a smoker you should better know that a campaign thing is what has dragged you.

But major youth smoke because their friends do. It’s all a company thing. 90% youth will quit smoking if they have option only to smoke alone. So if you want to quit, start smoking alone; never buy a packet and always go for every fag you going to smoke. Start eating ice creams because taste change will warn you.

I would like to end with this quotes of Einstein:

Gravitation is not responsible for people falling in love.which is not related by the way.

Friday, March 9, 2007

wtf


This picture has been conceptualized by an old friend of mine but he claims he still is. The picture shows an "Induhvidual" and if you don’t know what it refers to then you may be one of them (you can ask from me what it means but you can find on net also. Use wiki option on right.). Thats what Scott Adams says and I don't know why. He also says one will be surrounded by them everywhere in some time of his life. The pic shows an ass standing and gazing a circle which is actually a hole there. I want to stress that word “gazing” here has no relevance. I asked for more such circles from him but we are busy guys. Let’s call them dogs for I want to and this is my blog. Before proceeding I would like to mention few basics first:

  • California internship is cool.
  • Pukers are losers.
  • Losers are better than dumbs and dogs.
  • Holding my neck is biggest crime and especially if people get to know about it.(proved on dogs)
  • iPhone is a wow product. Please don’t laugh “my rocket partners”. Wow is good word to use except when you use in business mails.
  • Reebok is good brand to wear.
  • Don’t ever eat above your limits. Induhviduals get happy very easily so parties can be thrown anytime.
  • Induhviduals gradually starts losing friends for their intercourse buddies.
  • Induhviduals prefer pie language. Native ones have more strength they always say that.
Now I don't want to proceed so bye for now.

Wednesday, March 7, 2007

Mind you own business? So you are nuts


She is looking, she is intelligent and she is well managed. So starts the biddings as soon as looking factor is out. The world is getting flatter my dear and so you should realize it fast.

What’s the future btw? The pie will be wired and a single bit would be reshaping it. Every development does not augur well. And things here are never stopping and really no time to look back and think. No body wants to have his lexicon redefined. So is the outcome going to be Americanization? Lives are grappled between advancing and happiness and none has defined any to their reference frame.

Explanandum –developing outcome of some historical process – is progressively transformed into the explanans: changing character of the pie. Dr. money explained the phenomenon when even pie theory was doing great. And here it is

" Globalisation results in the exploitation of millions of workers in countries that do not give workers rights to organise. For example, a woman who sows a $200 Liz Claiborne jacket sown in El Salvador is paid just 74 cents – less than half of one per cent. In the US, the labour cost to sew a garment is typically 10 per cent of the retail price.

Workers in poor countries may have to work 12 hours a day, seven days a week with few protections for health and safety. In some countries, globalisation leads the exploitation of child, and prison labour."

For the record I am globalization supporter but imperialism and corporatism, please find a way here.

Monday, March 5, 2007

Silent Heal







A new project/policy? So there are the basic problems and questions arising in the mind. Patriotic and money does not matter? Well dude, there are more challenges you going to face.

Just going through an article in FRONTLINE I was really impressed by the strategies which actually exists in major of government projects and the main factor underlying all the survey reports and conclusions comes to India is a developing country. The principles and approaches should agree with the poor mass and the fact that India is a developing country, hence, growth. So are these two factors ways in two separate lanes?

As said India is diverse country is very true in respect when we consider wealth factor and standard of living in the mass. India is trying very hard to come up in global market but for a perfect development it definitely needs some sacrifices. The question then arises is what exactly you define as developing country. Well here is a definition I found best as far I have learnt now

A country whose per capita income is low by world standards. Same as LDC. As usually used, it does not necessarily connote that the country's income is rising.”

Some say “developing” is euphemism for “poor”. For a layman, developing country is a country that is in way of making a good industrial and commercial base and a country that is poor and whose citizens are mostly agricultural workers but that wants to become more advanced socially and economically. So what exactly is problem for a developing country or specifically India? We need to derive out a relation between growth and a fight for poverty.

I am not at all interested in figures here but one thing is for sure that agriculture has contributed a lot in India’s growth. Part of adverse Indian experiences are accounted by investments in large, long gestating, capital intensive projects such as electric power, irrigation and infrastructure. But the point is these all are quite necessary. Actually delayed completions, under use of capacity and cost overrun were major contributing factors.

There has been a distinction created by most officials and economists namely formal and informal sectors of economies. The first one constitutes mainly rural and urban sectors and latter one is focused by modern sector. Farmers and rural sectors constitute mainly major percentage of people below poverty line. So does this mean targeting these people will help erase poverty and the other side government can focus on growth too? The answer is very much complicated and is based on growth versus inflation.

You must be wondering what all crap I am talking about when I started on point of some new policy or project. The basic point here was inclusion of a model when devising any strategy for a new project or policy. The benefit should be accrued to poor as well as economy of country. In this context what Mahatma Gandhi said should guide policy: “The acid test of right action is to bring into your imagination the poorest man you have ever seen and decide if your policy is going to benefit him.” But today’s scenario of India requires forcing a model in every policy/project which should include following points:

1) How well the policy will help the poor?

In economic terms what measures should be adopted in this new model which can increase not just per capita income as whole but per capita income of people who lie below poverty line. Best model should be one which maximizes increase of per capita income of people having lowest per capita income. A statistical model is required to rate every model which emphasize on points based on x times rating for increase in per capita income multiplied by y times rating for the expectation value for present per capita of people it is aiming at.

2) How well it affects the growth of nation as a whole?

Well no need to discuss this factor. But there actually needs some revisions in policies which actually involve emphasis on this factor rather than individuals gains.

In the current models the first factor is generally stifled and considered only at time of elections or to gain appreciation but it should be stressed here that it is statutory. Fight for us right now is not to go developed but to eliminate poverty to the extent of developed countries. Any delay in consideration of factors will become more expensive and more difficult to work on and will be very much desired. Remember the rule of thumb that any fail in any economic factor causes poor to suffer most.